🔗 Share this article

When I am a DM, I historically steered clear of significant use of randomization during my Dungeons & Dragons sessions. My preference was for story direction and what happened in a game to be shaped by player choice as opposed to random chance. Recently, I opted to change my approach, and I'm incredibly happy with the result.

The Catalyst: Seeing a Custom Mechanic

A popular streamed game features a DM who frequently asks for "fate rolls" from the adventurers. The process entails choosing a polyhedral and defining potential outcomes tied to the result. It's essentially no different from using a pre-generated chart, these get invented in the moment when a character's decision lacks a obvious conclusion.

I decided to try this technique at my own game, primarily because it seemed engaging and presented a departure from my standard routine. The outcome were remarkable, prompting me to think deeply about the often-debated tension between planning and improvisation in a D&D campaign.

A Memorable Story Beat

During one session, my players had concluded a city-wide battle. Afterwards, a cleric character asked about two key NPCs—a sibling duo—had lived. Instead of choosing an outcome, I handed it over to chance. I told the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both would perish; a middling roll, a single one succumbed; a high roll, they made it.

The player rolled a 4. This triggered a deeply poignant moment where the characters found the corpses of their companions, still united in their final moments. The group conducted a ceremony, which was uniquely significant due to prior character interactions. As a final gesture, I chose that the remains were strangely restored, revealing a magical Prayer Bead. I rolled for, the item's contained spell was exactly what the party required to resolve another pressing quest obstacle. It's impossible to script such perfect story beats.

Sharpening DM Agility

This event made me wonder if randomization and spontaneity are actually the core of tabletop RPGs. Although you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles need exercise. Players often excel at ignoring the most carefully laid narratives. Therefore, a skilled DM must be able to think quickly and create content on the fly.

Utilizing similar mechanics is a excellent way to develop these skills without straying too much outside your comfort zone. The key is to use them for minor situations that have a limited impact on the session's primary direction. To illustrate, I would avoid using it to determine if the central plot figure is a secret enemy. Instead, I might use it to figure out if the PCs enter a room right after a major incident unfolds.

Empowering Collaborative Storytelling

This technique also serves to keep players engaged and cultivate the sensation that the story is dynamic, progressing in reaction to their choices immediately. It combats the perception that they are merely pawns in a DM's sole script, thereby strengthening the shared nature of the game.

Randomization has long been embedded in the original design. Original D&D were filled with charts, which suited a game focused on exploration. Although current D&D often emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the only path.

Achieving the Healthy Equilibrium

It is perfectly nothing wrong with thorough preparation. However, equally valid no problem with stepping back and letting the whim of chance to determine certain outcomes rather than you. Authority is a major factor in a DM's job. We need it to run the game, yet we can be reluctant to cede it, at times when doing so might improve the game.

The core advice is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Try a little improvisation for inconsequential outcomes. It may discover that the organic story beat is far more rewarding than anything you could have planned on your own.